Pancreatic islet autoantibodies as predictors of type 1 diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1

T Orban, JM Sosenko, D Cuthbertson… - Diabetes …, 2009 - Am Diabetes Assoc
T Orban, JM Sosenko, D Cuthbertson, JP Krischer, JS Skyler, R Jackson, L Yu, JP Palmer…
Diabetes care, 2009Am Diabetes Assoc
OBJECTIVE There is limited information from large-scale prospective studies regarding the
prediction of type 1 diabetes by specific types of pancreatic islet autoantibodies, either alone
or in combination. Thus, we studied the extent to which specific autoantibodies are
predictive of type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Two cohorts were
derived from the first screening for islet cell autoantibodies (ICAs) in the Diabetes Prevention
Trial–Type 1 (DPT-1). Autoantibodies to GAD 65 (GAD65), insulinoma-associated antigen-2 …
OBJECTIVE
There is limited information from large-scale prospective studies regarding the prediction of type 1 diabetes by specific types of pancreatic islet autoantibodies, either alone or in combination. Thus, we studied the extent to which specific autoantibodies are predictive of type 1 diabetes.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
Two cohorts were derived from the first screening for islet cell autoantibodies (ICAs) in the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 (DPT-1). Autoantibodies to GAD 65 (GAD65), insulinoma-associated antigen-2 (ICA512), and insulin (micro-IAA [mIAA]) were also measured. Participants were followed for the occurrence of type 1 diabetes. One cohort (Questionnaire) included those who did not enter the DPT-1 trials, but responded to questionnaires (n = 28,507, 2.4% ICA+). The other cohort (Trials) included DPT-1 participants (n = 528, 83.3% ICA+).
RESULTS
In both cohorts autoantibody number was highly predictive of type 1 diabetes (P < 0.001). The Questionnaire cohort was used to assess prediction according to the type of autoantibody. As single autoantibodies, ICA (3.9%), GAD65 (4.4%), and ICA512 (4.6%) were similarly predictive of type 1 diabetes in proportional hazards models (P < 0.001 for all). However, no subjects with mIAA as single autoantibodies developed type 1 diabetes. As second autoantibodies, all except mIAA added significantly (P < 0.001) to the prediction of type 1 diabetes. Within the positive range, GAD65 and ICA autoantibody titers were predictive of type 1 diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS
The data indicate that the number of autoantibodies is predictive of type 1 diabetes. However, mIAA is less predictive of type 1 diabetes than other autoantibodies. Autoantibody number, type of autoantibody, and autoantibody titer must be carefully considered in planning prevention trials for type 1 diabetes.
Am Diabetes Assoc