Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Alerts
  • Advertising/recruitment
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • By specialty
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Author's Takes
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews...
    • Mechanisms Underlying the Metabolic Syndrome (Oct 2019)
    • Reparative Immunology (Jul 2019)
    • Allergy (Apr 2019)
    • Biology of familial cancer predisposition syndromes (Feb 2019)
    • Mitochondrial dysfunction in disease (Aug 2018)
    • Lipid mediators of disease (Jul 2018)
    • Cellular senescence in human disease (Apr 2018)
    • View all review series...
  • Collections
    • Recently published
    • In-Press Preview
    • Commentaries
    • Concise Communication
    • Editorials
    • Viewpoint
    • Scientific Show Stoppers
    • Top read articles
  • Clinical Medicine
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Author's Takes
  • Recently published
  • Brief Reports
  • Technical Advances
  • Commentaries
  • Editorials
  • Hindsight
  • Review series
  • Reviews
  • The Attending Physician
  • First Author Perspectives
  • Scientific Show Stoppers
  • Top read articles
  • Concise Communication
Autophagy orchestrates the regulatory program of tumor-associated myeloid-derived suppressor cells
Themis Alissafi, … , Helen Gogas, Panayotis Verginis
Themis Alissafi, … , Helen Gogas, Panayotis Verginis
Published August 31, 2018; First published June 19, 2018
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2018;128(9):3840-3852. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI120888.
View: Text | PDF
Categories: Research Article Immunology

Autophagy orchestrates the regulatory program of tumor-associated myeloid-derived suppressor cells

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) densely accumulate into tumors and potently suppress antitumor immune responses, promoting tumor development. Targeting MDSCs in tumor immunotherapy has been hampered by lack of understanding of the molecular pathways that govern MDSC differentiation and function. Herein, we identify autophagy as a crucial pathway for MDSC-mediated suppression of antitumor immunity. Specifically, MDSCs in patients with melanoma and mouse melanoma exhibited increased levels of functional autophagy. Ablation of autophagy in myeloid cells markedly delayed tumor growth and endowed antitumor immune responses. Notably, tumor-infiltrating autophagy-deficient monocytic MDSCs (M-MDSCs) demonstrated impaired suppressive activity in vitro and in vivo, whereas transcriptome analysis revealed substantial differences in genes related to lysosomal function. Accordingly, autophagy-deficient M-MDSCs exhibited impaired lysosomal degradation, thereby enhancing surface expression of MHC class II molecules, resulting in efficient activation of tumor-specific CD4+ T cells. Finally, targeting of the membrane-associated RING-CH1 (MARCH1) E3 ubiquitin ligase that mediates the lysosomal degradation of MHC II in M-MDSCs attenuated their suppressive function, and resulted in markedly decreased tumor volume followed by development of a robust antitumor immunity. Collectively, these findings depict autophagy as a molecular target of MDSC-mediated suppression of antitumor immunity.

Authors

Themis Alissafi, Aikaterini Hatzioannou, Konstantinos Mintzas, Roza Maria Barouni, Aggelos Banos, Sundary Sormendi, Alexandros Polyzos, Maria Xilouri, Ben Wielockx, Helen Gogas, Panayotis Verginis

×

Figure 5

Impaired lysosomal degradation and increased surface expression of MHC II molecules in autophagy-deficient M-MDSCs.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Impaired lysosomal degradation and increased surface expression of MHC I...
(A) Heat map of differentially expressed genes in M-MDSCs isolated from spleens of B16-F10–inoculated Atg5ΔLysM and control mice (n = 3 mice per group). (B) Heat map of differentially expressed genes related to the lysosomal function in M-MDSCs isolated from the spleens of B16-F10 inoculated Atg5ΔLysM and control mice (n = 3 mice per group). (C) MFI of lysosensor in M-MDSCs from spleen (*P = 0.0470) and tumor (**P = 0.0335) of B16-F10–inoculated Atg5ΔLysM and control mice (n = 5 mice per group). (D) Percentage of protein degradation, using [3H] leucine, in M-MDSCs isolated from the spleens of B16-F10 inoculated Atg5ΔLysM and control mice treated with lysosomal inhibitors (NH4Cl and leupeptin or bafilomycin) or left untreated (n = 3 mice per group). *P = 0.0134, **P = 0.0084, ***P = 0.0195, ****P = 0.0128, #P = 0.0179, ##P = 0.0088, ###P = 0.0264. (E) Representative histograms for the expression of IAb by M-MDSCs of spleen or tumor of Atg5ΔLysM and control mice, n = 5 mice per group. (F) Representative confocal microscopy images for LAMP-1 (red), IAb(green), DAPI (blue), and Pearson’s correlation of IAb versus LAMP-1 (***P < 0.0001) in sorted M-MDSCs from splenocytes of B16-F10–inoculated Atg5ΔLysM and control mice (n = 4 mice/group). Scale bar: 10 μm. (G) Representative histograms for the expression of IAb by M-MDSCs isolated from spleens of B16-F10–inoculated Atg5fl/fl mice after in vitro stimulation with TES in the presence of NH4Cl or chloroquine. Geometric mean of IAb (***P < 0.0001, *P = 0.048) and relative expression of Ciita and IAb (***P < 0.0001) are shown, n = 8 mice per group. Results are mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was obtained by unpaired Student’s t test, or 2-way ANOVA (D and G). Representative results from 3 independent experiments are shown.
Follow JCI:
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts